Skip to main content
Waveney District Council

Development Management Policies Proposed Submission (Final Draft)

List Comments

This page shows comments that have been added.

Search for Comments

Search for Comments


Response Type
Order By
in order

There are 124 comments to display.

RespondentResponse DateDetails
Major (Retd) JE Brodie-Murphy 02 Mar 2010

Development Management Policies Proposed Submission (Final Draft) Development Management Policies Retail, Leisure and Office Development Town Centre Boundaries DM10

  • Comment ID: 2901441/1/DM10/-
  • Status: Accepted
My husband and I fully support the Halesworth Town Shopping Area as shown on Halesworth Town Centre map (drawn with a blue line) proposed by Waveney District Council.
Heathland Beach Caravan Park Ltd 10 Mar 2010

Development Management Policies Proposed Submission (Final Draft) Development Management Policies Natural Environment Strategic Gaps and Open Breaks DM28

  • Comment ID: 2905537/1/DM28/LC
  • Status: Accepted
Re the strategic gap between Kessingland and Pakefield. DM28. I would like to point out that this proposed gap DM28 currently contains a number of domestic dwellings(Oaklands Terrace, Heath Cottages, Heath Farm etc.) as well as my caravan park, Pontins Holiday Park and their PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, The London Childrens Camp at the 'Hollies', a business at 'Heath Farm'. The main point being that this area already has considerable residential and business occupation. Can you please inf
Durrants 18 Mar 2010

Development Management Policies Proposed Submission (Final Draft) Development Management Policies Employment Re-Use, Conversion and Replacement of Buildings in the Countryside for Employment Use 5.7

  • Comment ID: 2862625/1/5.7/1
  • Status: Accepted
Para 5.8 misrepresentation of National policy PPS4 policy EC12
Durrants 18 Mar 2010

Development Management Policies Proposed Submission (Final Draft) Development Management Policies Employment Re-Use, Conversion and Replacement of Buildings in the Countryside for Employment Use DM09

  • Comment ID: 2862625/2/DM09/3
  • Status: Accepted
Policy DM09 should include reference to the contents of National policy PPS4 EC12 and not mislead applicants
Durrants 18 Mar 2010

Development Management Policies Proposed Submission (Final Draft) Development Management Policies Housing Housing Development in the Countryside 7.60

  • Comment ID: 2862625/3/7.60/1
  • Status: Accepted
prescriptive marketing is unprofessional in many instances and denies the opportunity for consideration of the application on its own merits supported by professional assessments.
Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service 26 Mar 2010

Development Management Policies Proposed Submission (Final Draft) Development Management Policies Built and Historic Environment

  • Comment ID: 3056833/1/349556/-
  • Status: Accepted
In Section 11, both PPG 15 and PPG 16 need altering to Planning Policy Statement 5 (PPS5) 'Planning for the Historic Environment', to reflect the recent publication of the new Planning Policy Statemen, relating to the HIstoric Environment, which has replaced both PPGs 15 and 16.
Southwold and Reydon Society 28 Mar 2010

Development Management Policies Proposed Submission (Final Draft) Development Management Policies High Quality and Sustainable Design High Quality and Sustainable Design DM02

  • Comment ID: 2875201/1/DM02/-
  • Status: Accepted
(A) Need to define 'overall scale'. Would like to see restriction of developments in Southwold to 3 storeys. (B) Want to emphasise inappropriateness of under-provision of parking.
Southwold and Reydon Society 28 Mar 2010

Development Management Policies Proposed Submission (Final Draft) Development Management Policies High Quality and Sustainable Design Low Carbon and Renewable Energy 3.28

  • Comment ID: 2875201/2/3.28/2
  • Status: Accepted
The issue of planning permissions for medium and small scale wind, solar voltaics and other technologies, in Conservation Areas, should be kept under review.
Southwold and Reydon Society 28 Mar 2010

Development Management Policies Proposed Submission (Final Draft) Development Management Policies Coastal Erosion Coastal Change Management Area 4.6

  • Comment ID: 2875201/3/4.6/1
  • Status: Accepted
There should be some discussion of possible medium-term (10-30 years) consequences of erosion at Easton Bavents on substantial number of houses in North Southwold and South Reydon, and the need to consider mitigation by extension of the sea-wall northwards.
Southwold and Reydon Society 28 Mar 2010

Development Management Policies Proposed Submission (Final Draft) Development Management Policies Built and Historic Environment Protecting and Enhancing the Historic Environment 11.7

  • Comment ID: 2875201/4/11.7/2
  • Status: Accepted
The principle of use of energy efficient materials in construction should also be considered as relevant to conservation areas.
First pagePrevious page Page
of 13 Next pageLast page